Oscillation
A coherent muon-spin precession signal appears whenever the muon ensemble experiences a well-defined local field — an applied transverse field, or a spontaneous internal field set up by magnetic order. The components here are undamped: damping is intentionally separated, so a physical line shape is built by multiplying with a relaxation envelope,
Oscillatory * Exponential + Constant
for a Lorentzian-broadened line (dynamic disorder, dilute static moments) or
Oscillatory * Gaussian + Constant
for a Gaussian-broadened line (dense static field distribution). A bare
Oscillatory + Constant fits only a perfectly coherent signal and will
absorb the inevitable line shape into spurious phase and frequency residuals.
When a signal contains several inequivalent muon sites, a sum of two or three
Oscillatory components is generally preferable to one component with a
broadened envelope; if the field distribution is genuinely continuous, look
at the Fourier spectrum first (Fourier analysis), and for an
incommensurate distribution use Bessel.
Oscillatory
Coherent precession parameterised by frequency. In zero field on an ordered magnet the spontaneous frequency \(f = \gamma_\mu B_{\mathrm{int}}/2\pi\) acts as an order parameter and is the natural quantity to trend versus temperature (Parameter trending); in transverse field the frequency calibrates the local field, \(f\,[\mathrm{MHz}] \simeq 0.01355\,B\,[\mathrm{G}]\).
Name |
Symbol |
Unit |
Description |
|---|---|---|---|
|
\(A\) |
% |
Component asymmetry amplitude. |
|
\(f\) |
MHz |
Precession frequency. |
|
\(\phi\) |
rad |
Phase offset. |
The frequency is bounded non-negative; the phase is unrestricted. In a
well-tuned spectrometer the phase of the first component should sit close to
0; large fitted phases usually indicate an instrumental phase offset that
should be calibrated out, or a wrong model. Frequencies approaching the
inverse binned time step alias: seed frequency from a Fourier peak
(Fourier analysis) rather than letting the minimiser search. A fit
window covering fewer than two or three periods leaves the phase uncertain at
the \(\sim\pi\) level — extend the range or fix the phase.
A standalone damped-cosine Oscillatory model (with Lambda and
baseline) is available in the MODELS registry.
References
Blundell, Contemp. Phys. 40, 175 (1999).
OscillatoryField
The same precession parameterised by the local field \(B\) (Gauss), with
\(f = \gamma_\mu B/2\pi\). Use when the physically interesting quantity
is the field itself — extracting the temperature dependence of a sublattice
magnetisation, or comparing internal fields across runs in a
parameter-trending workflow. For a transverse-field muonium experiment,
model the central diamagnetic Mu⁺ line with this component and add
MuoniumTF for the Mu⁰ satellites. Mathematically equivalent to
Oscillatory.
Name |
Symbol |
Unit |
Description |
|---|---|---|---|
|
\(A\) |
% |
Component asymmetry amplitude. |
|
\(B\) |
G |
Local magnetic field at the muon site. |
|
\(\phi\) |
rad |
Phase offset. |
Bessel
The polarisation of an incommensurate magnet, such as a spin-density-wave state. When the ordering wavevector is incommensurate with the lattice, the implanted muons uniformly sample the phase of the modulation and hence the Overhauser distribution of local fields, \(p(B) = \pi^{-1}(B_1^2 - B^2)^{-1/2}\) for \(|B| < B_1\); the resulting polarisation is the zeroth-order Bessel function with \(f = \gamma_\mu B_1/2\pi\) set by the field-distribution edge. At late times
a damped cosine with a characteristic \(-45^\circ\) phase — so a
free-phase Oscillatory fit that insists on a phase near
\(-45^\circ\) is the classic sign that this component is needed.
Compose with a relaxation envelope for additional damping; for commensurate
order use Oscillatory or OscillatoryField.
Name |
Symbol |
Unit |
Description |
|---|---|---|---|
|
\(A\) |
% |
Component asymmetry amplitude. |
|
\(f\) |
MHz |
Field-distribution edge, γμB₁/2π. |
|
\(\phi\) |
rad |
Phase offset. |
References
Le et al., Phys. Rev. B 48, 7284 (1993).
VortexLattice / VortexLatticePowder
Transverse-field precession in the mixed state of a type-II superconductor.
Below \(T_c\) the muon samples the inhomogeneous field of the flux-line
lattice, whose distribution \(p(B)\) is strongly non-Gaussian — a sharp
low-field cutoff at the saddle point, a most-probable field below the mean, and
a long tail to high field near the vortex cores (a positively skewed line). The
relaxation \(R(t)=\langle e^{i 2\pi\gamma_\mu(B-\bar B)t}\rangle\) is the
characteristic function of the modified-London field distribution of an ideal
triangular lattice. Fitting the lineshape directly — rather than a single
Gaussian proxy, whose returned rate depends on the fit window and binning —
gives a window-independent penetration depth \(\lambda\) and upper critical
field \(B_{c2}\).
VortexLatticePowder applies the \(3^{1/4}\lambda_{ab}\) polycrystalline
average and returns the ab-plane depth \(\lambda_{ab}\). The line’s second
moment is calibrated to the Brandt result (see Superconducting penetration depth models),
so the depth read from this lineshape matches the field-domain
SC_Brandt_VortexLattice trend models. Multiply by a Gaussian for the
nuclear dipolar background and add Oscillatory + Constant for the
(weakly relaxing) sample-holder signal:
VortexLatticePowder * Gaussian + Oscillatory + Constant
Name |
Symbol |
Unit |
Description |
|---|---|---|---|
|
\(A\) |
% |
Component asymmetry amplitude. |
|
\(B\) |
G |
Applied transverse field (usually fixed). |
|
\(\phi\) |
rad |
Phase offset. |
|
\(\lambda\) |
nm |
Penetration depth (ab-plane for powder). |
|
\(B_{c2}\) |
T |
Upper critical field (core-size cutoff). |
field starts fixed at the applied value. \(B_{c2}\) is weakly
constrained by a single low-field run (where \(b=B/B_{c2}\to 0\)); fix it
from the literature or fit the field dependence to pin it. lambda_ab is
strongly correlated with the nuclear Gaussian rate, so constrain the latter
from a normal-state (above \(T_c\)) measurement at the same field.
References
Brandt, Phys. Rev. B 68, 054506 (2003).
Sonier, J. H. Brewer, and R. F. Kiefl, Rev. Mod. Phys. 72, 769 (2000).
Pratt et al., Phys. Rev. B 79, 052508 (2009).