Run arithmetic: co-add and co-subtract

Two runs of the same measurement add to one run with twice the statistics; a laser-on run minus its laser-off reference isolates the photo-excited signal. Asymmetry does both at the raw-count level — it sums (or subtracts) the detector histograms and reduces afterwards, never averaging the finished asymmetry curves. The combined row that appears in the Data Browser is a first-class run: it carries real histograms, so it can be regrouped, deadtime-corrected, count-fitted, and Fourier/MaxEnt-transformed exactly like a loaded run.

Both actions live in the Data Browser context menu. Select two or more runs and choose Co-add Selected; or select one run and choose Subtract Reference Run… to pick the reference to remove. “Separate Combined” restores the constituents.

Why count-level, not curve-level

The asymmetry and its error must see the total statistics. Summing counts first and reducing once gives the correct pooled Poisson error; averaging two reduced curves does not, unless the two runs happen to have identical statistics. For forward/backward totals \((F_1, B_1)\) and \((F_2, B_2)\) the count-sum route reduces \((F_1+F_2,\, B_1+B_2)\) to a single Poisson error, while the curve-mean route forms \(\tfrac12\sqrt{\sigma_1^2 + \sigma_2^2}\) — equal to the pooled error only when the runs match.

The gap grows with the imbalance. Co-adding a low-statistics run with one carrying ten times the events, the old curve-mean error bar over-estimates the combined error by 53 % relative to the correct pooled value; for two equal runs the two routes agree to better than 0.1 %. The asymmetry value is unchanged at \(\alpha = 1\) (both routes are linear in the counts there), but any nonlinear correction — deadtime, an \(\alpha \neq 1\) balance, a background subtraction — only comes out right when it acts on the summed counts. This is why the combined row keeps its histograms rather than a finished curve.

Co-add

Counts add bin-by-bin per detector; detectors whose time-zero differs (PSI multi-\(t_0\) data) are aligned to a common bin before summing, as for a single run’s grouping. Good frames accumulate, so the deadtime normaliser sees the combined exposure. Temperature and field are reported as the event-weighted mean over the constituents (weighted by good frames, the defensible summary of an inhomogeneous group), and the spread is recorded under temperature_spread / field_spread so a group spanning, say, 4.0(1)–10.0(1) K is visible rather than hidden behind a single averaged number. Period-mode (red/green) runs sum per period, preserving the two-period structure for the G∓R reduction.

Co-subtract (reference run)

A reference subtraction forms

\[N_i^{\text{diff}} = N_i^{\text{sample}} - s\, N_i^{\text{ref}},\]

per detector bin \(i\), where \(s\) is the good-frame ratio sample/reference — the same exposure scale the background-run correction uses, so two runs of unequal beam time are matched before subtraction. The two count spectra are independent, so the errors add in quadrature,

\[\sigma_i^{\text{diff}} = \sqrt{N_i^{\text{sample}} + s^2 N_i^{\text{ref}}},\]

and the reduced asymmetry of the difference is formed from these propagated errors rather than from a Poisson assumption that no longer holds. Bins that go negative after subtraction are unphysical as expected counts; their count is recorded in the combined run’s provenance so an over-subtraction is not silent.

WiMDA performs the same count-level subtraction (cosign = -1) but leaves the errors untouched; Asymmetry propagates them (see the porting study). WiMDA also keeps the master run’s temperature and field on a co-add, where Asymmetry event-weights them and records the spread.

When to use which.

  • Co-add — the same physical measurement repeated for more statistics. The result is one higher-statistics run; reduce, fit, or transform it normally.

  • Co-subtract (reference run) — remove a signal carried by a separate exposure: laser-OFF from laser-ON in photo-μSR, or a known reference run. Frame-scaled, errors add in quadrature.

  • Background-run correction (a reduction step, not a combined row; see backgrounds) — subtract a scaled background as part of reducing one run, when the background is a steady detector floor rather than a co-measured signal. It shares the same count-level subtraction arithmetic with co-subtract but does not create a new dataset.

Provenance and projects

The combined run records its constituents (combined_from), the operation and per-constituent weights/scales, the time-zero alignment, and any negative-count tally under metadata["combination"] — mirroring the simulation provenance block. Projects store only the definition (the source runs and the operation), so reloading a .asymp recomputes the combined row from its sources through the same count-level path; combined curves saved before this correction will recompute to the statistically correct values on load.

References

  • S. J. Blundell, R. De Renzi, T. Lancaster, and F. L. Pratt, Muon Spectroscopy: An Introduction (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2022).